
FORD THINKS IT'S FOR THE BIRDS
You probably didnt notice this article in the business
section of the OC Register, announcing Ford Motor Co.
had won an award from the Wildlife Habitat Council for its
Premier Automotive Group facility at One Premier Place in
Irvine.
We were intrigued by this, and decided to have a closer
look at the wildlife-enticing features to be found in the
landscape at One Premier Place.
The claims turned out to be as far-fetched as an
Expedition with 30 mpg fuel economy. Read on.
Of course, as landscapers we believe our product
((landscapes)) is essential to the health and well-being of
urban dwellers. There is a substantial body of research
into the physical and psychological benefits citizens derive
from attractive, landscaped business and retail centers.
And, growing plants improve the environment by
moderating temperatures, and cleaning and oxygenating
air. Still, the idea of commercial landscapes purposefully
designed to fulfill functions greater than ornamentation for
OC places of business is a challenge waiting to be
meaningfully implemented. Architects by and large are busy trying to mesh traditional planting
plans to irrigation restrictions; it’s doubtful they worry how the landscape is useful to the
community at large. But, we can still dream of the dual functions imaginable: food production,
astronomical observatory installations, living advertising or messaging, outdoor workspaces,
storm water capture and cleaning, native species re-introduction, or wildlife habitat. So, the
idea of a company like Ford genuinely supporting a facility featuring significant wildlife-habitat
enhancements was exciting.
The article mentions such notable and award worthy features of the landscape as
- the use of reclaimed water,
- the use of drought-tolerant plants (ivy, ficus, eucalyptus, ice plant are referenced),
- five hummingbird stations,
Let's examine each of these for its relative merits in protecting and enhancing wildlife habitat:
Reclaimed water. Every new commercial development within the Irvine Ranch Water District,
where One Premier Place is located, is irrigated with reclaimed water. This has been the case
for at least 10 years. The water district's aggressive water conservation policies are well
known throughout California. While the use of reclaimed water in Southern California is surely
worthwhile economically and socially, it's a bit of a stretch to applaud oneself for doing so
when one has no choice in the matter. And, it's not apparent how the use of reclaimed water
enhances this site's suitability for wildlife. The current issue with reclaimed water use is its
increasing salinity, which can limit the range of species suitable for planting such a site.

Drought tolerant plant palette. When we visited One Premier Place, it looked a lot like every
other site nearby . . . privet hedges line the street, a big lawn with lots of ficus microphylla in
front, lots of asphalt parking with planter islands sporting carrotwood trees and ivy. In back,
along the freeway, variegated ivy is planted; on the side there’s a big slope planted to ice
plant and eucalyptus trees. There’s a trellis along the back of the building planted to
kangaroo ivy, and at the entrance there is a deciduous tree, might have been a ginkgo, with a
planter area cut out of the surrounding turf at the base of its trunk. Of the plants present, just
the eucalyptus and ice plant are on the Sunset Western Garden Book’s list of over 200
proven drought tolerant plants. Eucalyptus are among the most commonly planted landscape
trees in Orange County, in spite of recent devastating infestations of these trees by various
imported pests, so their inclusion in the planting plan for the Ford site is hardly worthy of
special note. And, while the use of drought tolerant plantings is meritorious in its own right,
it’s not clear how it makes this site especially suitable as wildlife habitat.

Only one of the plants chosen (again, the eucalyptus) appears on lists of butterfly- or
bird-attracting plants. While no list can be by any means exhaustive, the lists consulted
include those compiled by Theodore Payne Foundation, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology,
Sunset Western Garden Book, and the Audubon Society. The extensive ivy plantings, on the
other hand, will probably prove effective as habitat for one form of local wildlife---rats. Rats
enjoy the thick cover provided by dense ivy ground cover, and may snack on the wooden
stems. There were many rodent bait stations already in place along the ivy bank the day we
visited.

Hummingbird stations: We did observe the hummingbird stations. Here’s one:

Here’s another one:

These "stations” are hummingbird feeders similar, if not identical, to those sold at dime
stores and garden centers everywhere. At $9.95 each, these stations represent an initial
investment in wildlife habitat of $ 53.61 (assuming CA sales tax was paid), or $0.000008 per
square foot of the facility. We didn't get close enough to check if there was nectar in the
feeders. Let's assume the stations are well maintained, and checked and refilled
twice-weekly. Given 6 minutes per feeder, that's 1 hour labor per week. At $25.00 per hour,
that's an annual expenditure for the birds of $1300, or $0.00199 per square foot plus some for
the nectar mixture.
Wildflower area: We did not see the wildflower area. Maybe it was the small planter area at the
base of the deciduous tree near the entrance. We'll have to revisit this as spring progresses to
see what wildflowers are in evidence.
In summary, we were not that impressed by the ingenuity nor commitment that Ford applied to
habitat enhancement at One Premier Place. But, there could be elements of design or
management that are not evident or mentioned in the press release. A wildlife-friendly
management plan will make sure the use of horticultural chemicals that harm birds and
beneficial insects is minimized to the greatest possible extent. It will also restrict tree trimming
during bird nesting periods. A wildlife-friendly management plan will allow plants on the site to
flower and fruit naturally to provide the greatest possibility of attracting and feeding birds and
beneficial insects. Privet, for instance, produces an abundance of nectar producing flowers in
spring, followed by berries that are food for birds. But, these are routinely sheared away in the
hedge-forming process. We will revisit the site in May to confirm whether the privet hedges are
being allowed to produce bird-attracting fruits. Perhaps the site's landscape management
plan has very comprehensive habitat-enhancement provisions.
So, who or what is the Wildlife Habitat Council that has bestowed an award on the Premier
Automotive Group facility? According to their website (www.wildlifehc.org), WHC is a non-profit,
non-lobbying 501(c)(3) group of corporations, conservation organizations, and individuals
dedicated to protecting and enhancing wildlife habitat. The WHC website is sponsored by
Ford Motor Company. To be fair, the complete description of the Premier Automotive Group
facility on the website is a lot more lucent than the Register article, but still makes statements
that exaggerate or misinterpret the reality of the landscaping at the site. We are not qualified to
comment on the merits of the building itself, except to say that few wildlife species (except
those we call pests) consider buildings like One Premier Place their natural habitat.
If it is worthwhile for corporate landowners to "protect and enhance wildlife habitat" at their
facilities, more emphasis must be placed in the landscape planning phase to select plant
material beneficial to wildlife and compatible with other site considerations. Of the thousands
of plants available to landscapers, many offer valuable resources to wildlife (larval food for
butterflies, nectar for butterflies and hummingbirds, seeds, nesting sites, nest-building
materials, protection from predators) that are becoming scarce due to development and the
reduced variety of plant species covering larger tracts of land. Planting the right plants for this
purpose pays off in natural habitat enhancement available to wildlife for the life of the
landscape, generally requiring only normal landscape maintenance procedures. There are no
hummingbird feeders to fill when you grow honeysuckle, and this plant produces not only
nectar, but seed for other birds as a bonus. Similarly, the cissus antarctica vine on the trellis
(a good choice for it's lower water needs) could have been replaced with parthenocissus,
which produces fruits attractive to birds.

If it is worthwhile to the public to "protect and enhance wildlife habitat" in our urban business
environments, we should expect more than lip service, PR spin, and five hummingbird
feeders of corporations like Ford Motor Company. And, the idea of commercial landscapes
purposefully designed to fulfill functions greater than ornamentation for OC places of
business is a challenge still waiting to be meaningfully taken up.